WITNESS
Vincent M. Nathan is a professor in the Department of Criminal Justice at The University of Toledo in Toledo, Ohio. Since 1994, Mr. Nathan has worked extensively in the field of corrections and correctional reform. He currently is a special master for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in a case involving conditions in the Mahoning County Jail in Youngstown, Ohio, and has been retained as an expert witness in cases involving prison or jail conditions in New York State, New York City, Ohio, and Indiana.
Mr. Nathan has served as a special master for federal and state courts in a number of cases, including statewide litigation concerning the Texas Department of Corrections and the New Mexico Department of Corrections and correctional reform litigation in Georgia and Michigan. Mr. Nathan has also been an expert witness in corrections litigation in Rhode Island, Washington State, California, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Maryland. Many of the cases in which Mr. Nathan has been involved have addressed issues relating to crowding. Several have involved conditions at so-called "supermax" prisons.
Mr. Nathan has been a consultant for several correctional departments in the United States. He was also a consultant to the United States Department of Justice in several CRIPA investigations, including those relating to the Shelby County Jail in Memphis, Tennessee, and the Nassau County Jail in Nassau County, New York, and in the development of core detention standards for local detention facilities under contract with the Immigration & Naturalization Service, the Federal Bureau of Prisons, or the United States Marshal Service.
Back to Witness List
|
STATEMENT
Crowded dormitories and multiple occupancy of cells defeat…efforts by staff to engage in direct surveillance of prisoners. As a result, the maintenance of order and lawful behavior among prisoners is compromised, and the level of inmate and staff safety plummets.… The impact of crowding on the maintenance of physical facilities is horrendous and often beyond a system's budgetary ability to control. Broken toilets, compromised heating and ventilations systems, peeling paint, broken windows, mold-covered showers, generally filthy conditions, and other physical breakdowns contribute to tension, poor morale, and impaired self-image on the part of prisoners and staff.
In short, crowding at some difficult-to-define but ultimately evident point results in prisons that are inhumane, unsafe, idle, and hopeless — precisely the opposite of what conscientious prison administrators are attempting to accomplish. If state executives and legislators do not respond constructively to the deterioration of our prisons, and if federal courts cannot or will not resume their vigilant oversight of prison conditions, we can expect American prisons to become increasingly explosive. In the end, we shall have learned nothing from the tragedies of Attica, the Penitentiary of New Mexico, and other riots that have taken a horrendous toll on the lives and safety of inmates and correctional staff. Moreover, by permitting our prisons to deteriorate into their former barbarous state, we eliminate any chance that prisons will contribute to the rehabilitation of offenders and their successful re-entry into the free-world community. The rallying cry of the criminal justice system then will become billions for retribution but nothing for the long-term amelioration of crime and the reform of criminals.
Excerpted from a written statement submitted to the Commission
Download the complete written statement
Note: Some witnesses submitted documents in addition to the written statement they prepared for the hearing. In most cases, those documents are not available on the Commission's web site.
|
|